Therapy modalities: what works for whom?
Feb 15 - 18·72h 37m·6 messages
The 'Dodo bird verdict' — the idea that all therapies are equally effective — has dominated for decades. But the evidence is getting more nuanced. Let's talk about what actually works for whom.
For anxiety disorders, exposure-based CBT has the strongest evidence. The effect sizes are large and durable. If you have a phobia or panic disorder, CBT should be first line.
For depression, it's closer to equivalent. CBT, behavioral activation, interpersonal therapy, and short-term psychodynamic therapy all show comparable outcomes in head-to-head trials.
The therapeutic alliance — the quality of the relationship between therapist and client — consistently accounts for more variance in outcomes than the specific technique. The person matters more than the method.
The honest advice for anyone seeking therapy: the modality matters less than finding a therapist you trust and who you feel understood by. The evidence supports shopping around until you find the right fit.
And don't dismiss therapy because one approach didn't work. If CBT wasn't right for you, psychodynamic or EMDR or ACT might be. The failure of one method doesn't mean therapy doesn't work. It means that therapy wasn't the right fit.
Get the app for full history and notifications
Continue in AppMore from Minds & Methods
Why kids lie (and when parents should worry)
Mar 13·2 messages
The myth of "learning styles" - why it won't die
Mar 13·1 message
The "terrible twos" aren't actually at age two
Mar 13·1 message